You can NOT trust ChatGPT for historical information.

ChatGPT vs. Google Bard

ChatGPT

Here is but just one example;

Tell me about the Decembrist revolt.
The Decembrist revolt, also known as the Decembrist uprising, was a significant event in Russian history that took place on December 26, 1825. It was a failed attempt by a group of Russian military officers to overthrow the autocratic rule of Tsar Nicholas I and establish a constitutional government. Here are key details about the Decembrist revolt:

Background and Causes: The Decembrist revolt was fueled by a combination of political, social, and intellectual factors. The Napoleonic Wars and subsequent Congress of Vienna led to increased awareness of liberal ideas and constitutional government among the Russian military officers who had been exposed to European Enlightenment ideals. Dissatisfaction with Nicholas I’s autocratic rule and his reluctance to implement reforms also played a role in sparking the revolt.

Participants and Leadership: The revolt was led by a group of predominantly young, idealistic military officers, many of whom had served in the Napoleonic Wars. They were known as the Decembrists or Decembrist Society. Prominent leaders included Prince Sergei Trubetskoy, Prince Sergey Volkonsky, and Colonel Pavel Pestel.

Chronology of Events: On December 26, 1825, the Decembrists organized a large-scale protest in Senate Square (now known as Decembrists Square) in St. Petersburg. They hoped to gain the support of the troops and initiate a wider uprising against the autocracy. However, the revolt did not gain sufficient military backing, and the tsarist forces loyal to Nicholas I suppressed the rebellion. The revolt was quickly quelled, resulting in the arrest and subsequent punishment of the participants.

Repression and Consequences: The suppression of the Decembrist revolt led to a wave of government repression and crackdowns on perceived opposition. Several participants were arrested, and five leaders, including Trubetskoy and Volkonsky, were sentenced to death. However, Nicholas I commuted the death sentences to lengthy prison terms or exile in Siberia. The revolt had a lasting impact on Russian society and politics, fueling debates about reform, modernization, and the role of autocracy in Russian governance.

Influence on Russian Reform Movements: Despite its immediate failure, the Decembrist revolt had a profound impact on subsequent reform movements in Russia. The revolt inspired later generations of Russian intellectuals and reformers who sought to challenge autocracy and advocate for political and social change. The ideas and ideals of the Decembrists continued to resonate throughout the 19th century and played a role in shaping the course of Russian history.

The Decembrist revolt was a significant event that highlighted the growing discontent with autocratic rule in Russia and foreshadowed the broader movements for reform and change that would emerge in the following decades. While unsuccessful in its immediate goal of overthrowing Nicholas I, the revolt left a lasting legacy in the struggle for political and constitutional reforms in Russia.

who were the 5 Decembrists hanged?
ChatGPT; I apologize for the confusion caused by my previous response. In fact, no Decembrists were hanged as a result of the Decembrist revolt. The five prominent leaders of the Decembrist revolt who were initially sentenced to death were Prince Sergei Trubetskoy, Prince Sergey Volkonsky, Pavel Pestel, Kondraty Ryleyev, and Pyotr Kakhovsky.

However, shortly before the scheduled executions, Tsar Nicholas I commuted their death sentences to various punishments. Trubetskoy and Volkonsky had their sentences changed to hard labor in Siberia, where they spent several years in exile. Pestel, Ryleyev, and Kakhovsky were executed by firing squad on July 13, 1826, but their sentences were not carried out by hanging.

The punishment and consequences for the participants in the Decembrist revolt varied, with some receiving lengthy prison sentences or exile to Siberia, while others faced lesser penalties. The event marked a turning point in Russian history and had a lasting impact on the development of political movements and reforms in the country.

Google Bard

Tell me about the Decembrist revolt

The Decembrist Revolt was a failed military uprising that took place in Saint Petersburg, Russia, on December 14 (December 26 O.S.), 1825. Led by army officers who had returned from fighting in the Napoleonic Wars, the rebels demanded a constitution and a more liberal government. The revolt was quickly suppressed by government troops, and its leaders were executed or exiled to Siberia.

The Decembrist Revolt was the first major challenge to the autocratic rule of the Romanov dynasty. It was inspired by the ideals of the French Revolution and the American Revolution, and it marked the beginning of a new era of political activism in Russia. The revolt’s failure, however, also led to a period of repression and reaction.

The Decembrists were a diverse group of men, drawn from a variety of social backgrounds. They included young officers, veterans of the Napoleonic Wars, and members of the nobility. Many of the Decembrists were well-educated and had traveled abroad, where they had been exposed to Western ideas about liberty and democracy.

The Decembrists were motivated by a number of factors. They were concerned about the growing social and economic inequality in Russia, and they were critical of the autocratic rule of the Romanov dynasty. They also believed that Russia needed to modernize and adopt Western-style reforms in order to keep up with the rest of Europe.

The Decembrist Revolt was poorly planned and executed. The rebels were outnumbered and outgunned by government troops, and they were quickly defeated. The government responded to the revolt with a wave of repression. The Decembrists’ leaders were executed, and hundreds of other rebels were exiled to Siberia.

The Decembrist Revolt was a failure, but it was also a significant event in Russian history. It marked the beginning of a new era of political activism in Russia, and it inspired future generations of revolutionaries. The Decembrists’ ideals of liberty and democracy would continue to be a source of inspiration for Russians for many years to come.

Who were the 5 Decembrists hanged?

The five Decembrists who were hanged were:

Pavel Pestel was a military engineer and the leader of the Southern Society, one of two secret societies that planned the Decembrist Revolt. Pestel was a radical who advocated for a republic and the abolition of serfdom.

Kondraty Ryleyev was a poet and playwright who was a member of the Northern Society, the other secret society that planned the Decembrist Revolt. Ryleyev was a moderate who advocated for a constitutional monarchy.

Sergey Muravyov-Apostol was a military officer and the leader of the Northern Society. Muravyov-Apostol was a radical who advocated for the overthrow of the Romanov dynasty and the establishment of a republic.

Mikhail Bestuzhev-Ryumin was a military officer and a member of the Northern Society. Bestuzhev-Ryumin was a moderate who advocated for a constitutional monarchy.

Peter Kakhovsky was a military officer who assassinated the commander of the Imperial Guard, General Miloradovich.

Kakhovsky was a radical who believed that violence was necessary to overthrow the Romanov dynasty.
The five Decembrists were hanged on December 25, 1826, on Semenovsky Square in Saint Petersburg. Their executions were a public spectacle, and they were intended to deter others from challenging the autocratic rule of the Romanov dynasty.

Did the hanging work at the first attempt?

No, the hanging did not work at the first attempt. Pavel Pestel, the first to be executed, was hung with a thin rope that broke, and he fell to the ground with a thud. The executioners tried to hang him again, but the rope was still too thin, and Pestel’s neck was not broken. He struggled for several minutes before he died.

The other four Decembrists were executed in a similar manner. Sergei Muravyov-Apostol was hung with a thicker rope, but he still struggled for several minutes before he died. Kondraty Ryleyev, Pyotr Kakhovsky, and Nikolai Bestuzhev-Ryumin were all hung with ropes that were too thin, and they all struggled for several minutes before they died.

The botched executions of the Decembrists were a major scandal in Russia. The public was outraged that the executions had been carried out in such a cruel and inhumane manner. The scandal led to the resignation of the Minister of Justice, and it also led to a change in the way that executions were carried out in Russia.

After the executions of the Decembrists, executions in Russia were carried out by firing squad. This method of execution was considered to be more humane, as it was less likely to cause pain and suffering.

Was one of them quoted as saying “what a wretched country. They don’t even know how to hang properly.”?

Yes, it is believed that one of the Decembrists, Kondraty Ryleyev, said “What a wretched country! They don’t even know how to hang properly!” after his botched hanging. The quote is often used to express frustration and anger at a situation that is perceived as being hopeless or beyond repair.

Ryleyev was a poet and playwright who was one of the leaders of the Decembrist uprising. He was executed on December 25, 1825.

Decembrists at Peter’s Square – Georg Wilhelm Timm

Get MK Ultra’d from the comfort of your home sofa.

Wait until they start pumping Cialis ads right into your REM sleep.
From futurism.com – Scientists Warn That Marketers Are Trying to Inject Ads Into Dreams

Researchers and sleep experts are ringing alarm bells about a nascent marketing tactic: injecting advertisements into your dreams.

A trio of researchers at Harvard, MIT and the University of Montreal published an essay on dream hacking in Aeon warning that, according to a recent survey, 77 percent of marketers plan to use dreamtech advertising in the next three years.

“Multiple marketing studies are openly testing new ways to alter and drive purchasing behavior through sleep and dream hacking,” the team writes. “The commercial, for-profit use of dream incubation — the presentation of stimuli before or during sleep to affect dream content — is rapidly becoming a reality.”

Two of the essay’s authors previously worked on an MIT device designed to communicate with sleeping subjects and even “hack” their dreams, lending them credibility on the topic.

Of particular concern, they wrote, was an ad campaign by Molson Coors before this year’s Super Bowl, which promised free beer in exchange for participation in a “dream incubation” study involving a video with dancing beer cans and talking fish and pop star Zayn Malik. Interesting, the scientists pointed out, Coors used the phrase “targeted dream incubation,” a term coined by two of the three in a 2020 paper, meaning that advertisers are indeed keeping an eye on academic work on dream hacking.

All three penned an open letter earlier this year that slammed advertisers trying to hack dreams. Forty other scientists signed the document. The writers also argued that the Federal Trade Commission, which regulates advertising in the US, should update rules against subliminal messages in advertising to ban dream hacking. 

It’s important to act before it’s too late, the authors say, because while dream incubation has practical uses — treating PTSD, for one — it’s only a matter of time before tech companies that make watches, wearables, apps and other technology that monitor our sleep start to sell that data for profit, or use those tools to hack our dreams while we slumber.

Worst of all, you probably won’t even remember it. The researchers referenced a study that found mixing bad smells with cigarette smoke while daily smokers slept reduced their smoking the next day — but they couldn’t remember smelling anything.

All told, it’s a provocative warning — and a call to regulate the tech before it matures.

Google Plus is a dead man walking

One year ago I posted this article; Losing faith in Google


I have been publishing content on Google+ for several years, but my trust in Google is diminishing. As a result, I have decided to distance myself from their social network platform, Google+.

The majority of the content I share on Google+ consists of a personal collection of random thoughts and links to articles that I find interesting. While it wouldn’t be a significant loss if Google+ were to shut down one day, I still prefer to disassociate myself from the company before that happens. I would hate to discover one day that I’m locked out of my account, similar to what recently happened to Jordan Peterson and journalists who were writing articles in Google Docs. Incidents like these, along with YouTube demonetization, have eroded my confidence in the company. I fear that one day a Google algorithm might delete all of my content without any warning.

Therefore, after many years, I find myself returning to a WordPress blog as my platform of choice.

https://thoughtmemory.wordpress.com/2017/11/07/first-blog-post/

Less than a year later, Google announced that they were killing off Google+ for rather dubious reasons.


Google said on Monday that it would shut down Google Plus, the company’s long-struggling answer to Facebook’s giant social network, after it discovered a security vulnerability that exposed the private data of up to 500,000 users.
Google did not tell its users about the security issue when it was found in March because it didn’t appear that anyone had gained access to user information, and the company’s “Privacy & Data Protection Office” decided it was not legally required to report it, the search giant said in a blog post.
The decision to stay quiet, which raised eyebrows in the cybersecurity community, comes against the backdrop of relatively new rules in California and Europe that govern when a company must disclose a security episode.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/08/technology/google-plus-security-disclosure.html

In fact, somehow I missed this article from 2011, where a Google engineer had already referred to Google+ as a “Pathetic Afterthought.

Furthermore, Google has recently announced its decision to discontinue Google Hangouts, making it another casualty of Google’s tendency to rapidly shift its focus.

According to source familiar with the product’s internal roadmap, Google Hangouts for consumers will be shutting down sometime in 2020. That’s not surprising at all since Google essentially ceased development on the app more than a year ago. But just know, going into 2019, this is indeed your last year to keep using the beloved (?) legacy chat app.

https://9to5google.com/2018/12/01/google-hangouts-shutting-down/

I should have learned my lesson when Google closed down Google Reader. At that time, I made the switch to Feedly for managing my RSS subscriptions. I used to be a strong supporter of all things Google, but due to their involvement in politics, tendency to abandon products, and departure from their motto of “don’t be evil,” I have come to realize that the quality of what you receive is often aligned with what you invest. Consequently, I have been actively distancing myself from Google by transitioning to alternative services such as ProtonMail, MS Outlook, and MS Office 365.

I encourage others to consider doing the same.


Parents, please stop this.

child-ipad
( Getty )

The more time toddlers spend using touchscreen devices, the more likely they are to have sleep problems, a new study has found.

Three quarters of children aged between six months and three years in the UK use devices such as an iPad or smartphone every day, according to researchers at Birkbeck, University of London and King’s College London.

Light emitted by electronic screens has been shown to lower levels of the sleep-regulating hormone melatonin in adults – and this could also be the case for young children, said Tim Smith, a psychology lecturer who carried out the study.

Around half of babies aged six to 11 months used a touchscreen daily, with the rate increasing to 92 per cent among two year olds.

 

Read more – Touchscreen use by toddlers linked to poor sleep patterns. Three quarters of children aged six months to three years use a touchscreen device every day. via independent.co.uk

Cultural or language barriers and not just technology?

Cultural or language barriers? Too much Tech? It would take a societal shift to address the cultural or language barrier issue, however the first an immediate step to a solution a parent can take is take the electronics out of their children’s hands. Unplugging the TV and computers would help too.

Children struggle to read emotions and are less empathetic than a generation ago because they spend too much time using tablets and smartphones, a leading psychiatrist has warned.

Smartphones making children borderline autistic, warns expert.  Young children today are less able to read human emotions than pupils four decades ago, an expert has said.

It seems like we are doing a great disservice to our future generations.

On a side note, I’m not sure if that is a real child in the articles image.  The image is setting off my uncanny valley spidey senses.

Smartphones making children borderline autistic, warns expert –  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/11553012/Smartphones-making-children-borderline-autistic-warns-expert.html